<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Fearless Path &#187; Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fearlesspath.net/category/education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fearlesspath.net</link>
	<description>"True morality consists not in following the beaten track but in finding out the true path for ourselves and fearlessly following it.": Mohandas K. Gandhi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Seven Spheres of Influence</title>
		<link>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/12/16/seven-spheres-of-influence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/12/16/seven-spheres-of-influence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fearlesspath.net/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read in a recent piece by David Brooks that, “Over the past seven months, the number of people who say government is doing too many things better left to business has jumped from 40 percent to 48 percent, according to a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.”  My first reaction was, “Remember last year when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read in a recent piece by David Brooks that, “Over the past seven months, the number of people who say government is doing too many things better left to business has jumped from 40 percent to 48 percent, according to a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll.”  My first reaction was, “Remember last year when ‘business’ ruined our economy?’”  My second reaction was, “Why must we choose between only two options, business or government?”  <span id="more-228"></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p>There are more areas of influence than these two facets.  Among them are academia, media, church, community, and family.  All of these are VERY powerful forces.  Unfortunately they have been hijacked by the first two.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Academia</strong> has been marginalized as impractical.  “It’s all theory.”  Education has been turned into job training—<em>for business</em>.  Our culture no longer seeks education to better itself, but to better its chances in the marketplace and to better its earning potential.  Consequently, we are well-trained but poorly educated.  We seek easy answers and eschew tough questions.  We have lost the art of discussion and debate, and instead seek out “news sources” that validate rather than challenge our opinions.  In order for academia to regain strength, we must value a thinking education, not just job training or certification, as an integral part of the betterment of our culture.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The <strong>media</strong> have been turned into the <em>business</em> of entertainment; even programs that purport to inform feel they must sensationalize and “play to the audience.”  There are too few media outlets that make us think and give us unbiased information or make us take a hard look at our warts in the mirror.  Instead they distract us from what is really happening and what we must make happen in response.  They make us feel we’re too small to affect the world around us or that the problem lies with someone else.  We must 1) unplug ourselves and seek better sources of information, sources that make us think (books?); and/or 2) become our own media to the people within our circle of influence.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Religion</strong> has lost much of its influence in America.  Although more than 90% of Americans believe in “god,” few participate in organized religion, a tragedy in regards to social support systems.  But, thanks to government, churches don’t have to do these things anymore (irony alert).  They don’t have to “lift up the hands which hang down,” “visit the fatherless and widows,” feed the hungry, give drink to the thirsty, take in the stranger, clothe the naked, visit the sick, or go unto the prisoner.  The <em>government</em> does all that for us, right?  And so we lose sight of that other side of humanity, and therefore lose perspective on life itself.  We must take back the role of “pure religion” from the government, because we can care for our neighbor better than they can.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Community</strong> is a dead concept to most Americans.  We look to Washington and Wall Street for our needs to be met.  We expect individual solutions from people trying to spit into an anthill from 30,000 feet in the air.  Ironically, the more needs we have locally, the more we look to Washington for solutions.  Fat federal fingers don’t have the dexterity of local people, organizations, and functions.  Some of the best solutions to our most pressing needs are conceived and implemented at the local level.  We should all be looking for ways to solve problems locally and to pull back to the local level as much as possible.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The <strong>family</strong>is under heavy stress.  Success in families requires selflessness, absolute commitment, time, and a very thick skin, all of which are in short supply in our culture.  Selfishness, pride, and a lack of integrity lead to unmended rifts, divorce, misprioritization of time, money, and emotional effort, an inability to communicate—all of which disintegrates the foundation of society.  None of the other six areas can compensate for the family.  We must put honor above pride, family above self, and integrity above success.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Only through equalizing these spheres of influence can we achieve the balance we need in our lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/12/16/seven-spheres-of-influence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For on his brow I see that written which is Doom</title>
		<link>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/12/05/for-on-his-brow-i-see-that-written-which-is-doom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/12/05/for-on-his-brow-i-see-that-written-which-is-doom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Means-based Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fearlesspath.net/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the sharpest social critics of 19th century European industrial capitalism was…Charles Dickens. Those who have read Karl Marx’s writings see the world that he is attacking; those who have read Oliver Twist, Great Expectations, Bleak House, or A Christmas Carol will see that same world. However, we find the world described by Dickens, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the sharpest social critics of 19th century European industrial capitalism was…Charles Dickens. Those who have read Karl Marx’s writings see the world that he is attacking; those who have read Oliver Twist, Great Expectations, Bleak House, or A Christmas Carol will see that same world. However, we find the world described by Dickens, because it is novelized, less abrupt and perhaps more understandable.<span id="more-221"></span></p>
<p>I just returned from seeing my children perform in a children’s production of A Christmas Carol and I had to write this. It has been on my mind since last Christmas season.</p>
<p>In Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol occurs the following exchange:</p>
<p><em>&#8216;Forgive me if I am not justified in what I ask,&#8217; said Scrooge, looking intently at the Spirit&#8217;s robe, &#8216;but I see something strange, and not belonging to yourself, protruding from your skirts. Is it a foot or a claw?&#8217;</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;It might be a claw, for the flesh there is upon it,&#8217; was the Spirit&#8217;s sorrowful reply. &#8216;Look here.&#8217;<img class="alignright" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/A_Christmas_Carol_-_Ignorance_and_Want.jpg" alt="" width="313" height="390" /></em></p>
<p><em>From the foldings of its robe, it brought two children; wretched, abject, frightful, hideous, miserable. They knelt down at its feet, and clung upon the outside of its garment.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;Oh, Man! look here! Look, look, down here!&#8217; exclaimed the Ghost.</em></p>
<p><em>They were a boy and a girl. Yellow, meagre, ragged, scowling, wolfish; but prostrate, too, in their humility. Where graceful youth should have filled their features out, and touched them with its freshest tints, a stale and shrivelled hand, like that of age, had pinched, and twisted them, and pulled them into shreds. Where angels might have sat enthroned, devils lurked, and glared out menacing. No change, no degradation, no perversion of humanity, in any grade, through all the mysteries of wonderful creation, has monsters half so horrible and dread.</em></p>
<p><em>Scrooge started back, appalled. Having them shown to him in this way, he tried to say they were fine children, but the words choked themselves, rather than be parties to a lie of such enormous magnitude.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;Spirit, are they yours?&#8217; Scrooge could say no more.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;They are Man&#8217;s,&#8217; said the Spirit, looking down upon them. &#8216;And they cling to me, appealing from their fathers. This boy is Ignorance. This girl is Want. Beware them both, and all of their degree, but most of all beware this boy, for on his brow I see that written which is Doom, unless the writing be erased. Deny it!&#8217; cried the Spirit, stretching out its hand towards the city. &#8216;Slander those who tell it ye! Admit it for your factious purposes, and make it worse! And abide the end!&#8217;</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;Have they no refuge or resource?&#8217; cried Scrooge.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8216;Are there no prisons?&#8217; said the Spirit, turning on him for the last time with his own words. &#8216;Are there no workhouses?&#8217;</em></p>
<p>It is easy to sit back and criticize the government for either not doing enough for those who are in real need or for providing entitlements and creating a portion of society dependent on and enthralled to an entity of force. It’s like “shooting fish in a barrel” to complain that business is “heartless” and seeking profit at the expense of the worker.</p>
<p>Where does the responsibility lay? Is it the purview of religion to make sure there is no Want or Ignorance? Is it the isolated role of the education establishment to assure gaining of knowledge, guaranteeing that there will be No Child Left Behind? Do the specialists in the media have the role of informing, opining, swaying public opinion and in effect telling people how to think?</p>
<p>At whose feet does Dickens lay the problems of Want and Ignorance? At yours. At mine. Are there no institutions to solve the problems? Are there no schools to educate the ignorant? Why is ignorance persistently present? Are there no TV programs, internet sites, radio programs, newspapers? Are there no welfare programs? Are there no church programs to address the issue of want? The problems are yours and mine. The solutions will be found in how you and I see the world and our fellow inhabitants hereon.</p>
<p>How often do we find that we use the excuse that Scrooge does early in the book in an attempt to justify Jacob Marley’s existence on earth: “But you were always a good man of business.”? How often are we too busy, to involved in “working for that which does not satisfy” to recognize what we must be truly about here on this planet? True social leadership requires some degree of the following attitude:</p>
<p><em>“Oh! Captive, bound and double-ironed, not to know that ages of incessant labor, by immortal creatures, for this earth, must pass into eternity before the good of which it is susceptible is all developed! Not to know that any Christian spirit working kindly in its little sphere, whatever it may be, will find its mortal life too short for its vast means of usefulness! Not to know that no space of regret can make amends for one life’s opportunities misused!</em></p>
<p>When we choose to follow the path of statesmanship, social leadership, discipleship, whatever the term, we sign up for the burden described above. We understand that our responsibility is profound and hard. We don’t cast blame on others for the problems of society; we accept them whole-heartedly as our own and understand that only through our actions can these “children of Mankind”, Want and Ignorance, be transformed by lovingly nourishing each other and sowing knowledge and truth.</p>
<p>Action Step: Seek out those opportunities this year that will allow you to take responsibility for your true business. Remember: <em>“Mankind [is our] business. The common welfare [is our] business; charity, mercy, forbearance, and benevolence [are all our] business. The dealings of [our trades are] but a drop of water in the comprehensive ocean of [our] business!”</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/12/05/for-on-his-brow-i-see-that-written-which-is-doom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our National Books</title>
		<link>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/05/18/our-national-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/05/18/our-national-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moral Character]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fearlesspath.net/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a book I recently read (that I wish I had read 20 years ago), A Thomas Jefferson Education, the author speaks of national books.  “A national book is something that almost everyone in the nation [note the use of “nation” rather than “country”] accepts as a central truth.”  Each nation has its own books, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">In a book I recently read (that I wish I had read 20 years ago), <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">A Thomas Jefferson Education</em>, the author speaks of national books.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>“A national book is something that almost everyone in the nation [note the use of “nation” rather than “country”] accepts as a central truth.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Each nation has its own books, although in some cultures the national “books” are (or were in the past) oral traditions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>These books have much to do with the establishment of a national identity and culture.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>They can be good (<em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">War and Peace</em>) or bad (<em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Mein Kampf</em>), religious (<em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Bhagavad Gita</em>) or secular (Shakespeare). </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">The book cites Allan Bloom’s assertion that America’s national books through its first 150 years were the “Declaration of Independence” and the Bible.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>But somehow in the 1950s and 60s familiarity with these national books dropped off dramatically.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>The problem this causes is immense—we no longer have these essential works as the foundation of our culture.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>This begs the question: What has replaced them? <span id="more-109"></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">It seems that we don&#8217;t have any national books anymore.  What books do almost all Americans read in common?  I postulate that our new national books are not books at all, but are in fact movies and television.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Yes, it’s scary, but I think it’s true.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We watch them, quote them, discuss them in our social gatherings and at the water cooler.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Do we quote the Bible?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>I think we, as a nation, quote the Bible very frequently, but we don’t know we’re doing it.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Former Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee used a lot of Biblical allusions, but </span><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18821021"><span style="font-size: small; color: #800080; font-family: Times New Roman;">he confused a lot of people with them</span></a> <span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">because of our general biblical ignorance in America</span><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">On the other hand, quotes from recent or classic movies permeate our daily language.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>“Make him an offer he can’t refuse,” “Luke, I am your father,” “Tina, ya fat lard!”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We can give a detailed description of Jim and Pam’s courtship, but not Isaac and Rebecca’s faith-building first encounter.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We can name all the contestants on American Idol, but not half of the twelve tribes of Israel.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We quote advice given by Oprah, Dr. Phil, or Rush Limbaugh, but we don’t know the Sermon on the Mount—the best “advice” we could ever have for a happy life.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We can name more of the last 12 Heisman Trophy winners than we can the original twelve apostles.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">So what?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>What if we don’t all read the same books?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Can’t we all just read good books, or even see good movies that reaffirm our sense of right and wrong?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Yes, we could, if we talked about them that way.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>But we don’t.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Instead of getting into the details of the morals taught in movies or TV shows, we call them “a triumph of the human spirit” or “a feel-good movie.”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Can you imagine a co-worker coming up to you and saying, “Y’know, I was reading in Genesis the other day about Abraham, and I was wondering what he was thinking as he took Isaac up the mountain to sacrifice him, knowing that his own parents had tried to offer Abraham as a sacrifice when he was young.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>He must have had some real certainty of his commandment from God”?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>I can’t.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">What do we do about it?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Well, first we return to our national books.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>When was the last time you read the “Declaration?”<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Have you read the entire Bible (I know I haven’t) or your scripture?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Second, we need to move the current situation in the right direction.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>We need to talk about those “triumph of the human spirit” movies in terms of right and wrong, good choices and bad.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>What are the choices characters must make?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Why do they choose the way they do, and what are the results?<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>This is most important for children, especially when movies are not as explicitly didactic as <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Little House on the Prairie </em>was (it’s also a good chance to talk to our kids and to give them a better understanding of our own values, our “family books”).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNoSpacing" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;">The concept of a national book is so extremely important.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>It is a gathering place for the souls of our people.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Unfortunately, we as a nation have set our books down and not picked them up again.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>It’s time to do so—in fact it’s past time.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">  </span>Let’s do it today.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fearlesspath.net/2009/05/18/our-national-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
